Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892187›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025

Biological approaches to mitigate heavy metal pollution from battery production effluents: advances, challenges, and perspectives.

Andrea Monroy-Licht, Walter Jose Martinez-Burgos, Júlio Cesar de Carvalho, Matheus Cavali, Adenise Lorenci Woiciechowski, Susan Grace Karp, Carlos Ricardo Soccol, Ana C De la Parra-Guerra, Roberta Pozzan, Rosa Acevedo-Barrios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea Monroy-LichtChemistry and Biology Group, Chemistry and Biology Department, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, 081007, Colombia. Alicht@uninorte.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1188-6324
Walter Jose Martinez-BurgosDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology, Federal University of Parana, Centro Politécnico, Curitiba, 81531-990, Parana, Brazil.
Júlio Cesar de CarvalhoDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology, Federal University of Parana, Centro Politécnico, Curitiba, 81531-990, Parana, Brazil.
Matheus CavaliDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 88040-370, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3764-5078
Adenise Lorenci WoiciechowskiDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology, Federal University of Parana, Centro Politécnico, Curitiba, 81531-990, Parana, Brazil.
Susan Grace KarpDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology, Federal University of Parana, Centro Politécnico, Curitiba, 81531-990, Parana, Brazil.
Carlos Ricardo SoccolDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology, Federal University of Parana, Centro Politécnico, Curitiba, 81531-990, Parana, Brazil.
Ana C De la Parra-GuerraDepartment of Natural and Exact Sciences, Universidad de La Costa, Barranquilla, 080002, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0074-3149
Roberta PozzanLaboratory of Cell Toxicology, Department of Cell Biology, Polytechnic Center, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, 81531-908, PR, Brazil.
Rosa Acevedo-BarriosGrupo de Estudios Químicos y Biológicos, Dirección de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, POB 130001, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5593-0171

Funding

Fondation L'Oréal 4030391169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Battery production generates effluents containing various pollutants, predominantly heavy metals such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and chromium (Cr), which represent a serious risk to human health and the environment. Given their persistence, toxicity, and mobility in ecosystems and biota, heavy metals can bioaccumulate and, in some cases, enter the food chain. With this context in mind, this review presents emerging bioremediation technologies to treat effluents from battery production, focusing on biological methods such as biosorption, phytoremediation, and the use of microorganisms. Heavy metal removal mechanisms and conventional treatments are reviewed, with emphasis on biological approaches. Biosorption emerges as the most used strategy (54.4%) across organisms from different kingdoms. In addition, existing knowledge gaps in battery industry effluent management research are identified, proposing future directions that include the integration of sustainable technologies and the use of traditional knowledge of local communities. This approach seeks not only to mitigate the environmental impact of battery production but also to promote more responsible and equitable production practices, aligned with the principles of environmental justice and sustainability.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiodegradation, EnvironmentalHumansMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalBattery effluentsBioremediationHeavy metalsMicroorganismNanomaterialsPhytoremediation

Identifiers

PMID40892187
PMCPMC12443945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.