Observational studyInternational urology and nephrology2026
Decision satisfaction and regret in patients undergoing ATOMS® adjustable sling for male urinary stress incontinence: data from a third level referral centre.
Observational study in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Regret in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Decision satisfaction and regret in patients undergoing ATOMS® adjustable sling for male urinary stress incontinence: data from a third level referral centre.International urology and nephrology · 2026Observational
- Adjustable continence therapy (ProACTTranslational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Comment on "Exploring patient decision regret following robot‑assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective cohort study".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study aimed to evaluate treatment satisfaction and decisional regret in patients who underwent Adjustable Trans-Obturator Male System (ATOMS®) implantation for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
methodsThis retrospective, observational, single-arm cohort study reviewed records of 134 patients who underwent ATOMS implantation between January 2014 and December 2021. Data collected included demographics, pre- and post-operative continence status, complications classified by Clavien-Dindo, and patient-reported outcomes using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-UI SF). Decisional regret was assessed using the validated Decision Regret Scale (DRS). Predictors of regret were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
resultsPatients had a median age of 72 years, with 30% reporting moderate/severe regret (> 25%). Regret was significantly associated with prior radiotherapy, diabetes, higher preoperative pad usage, and worse postoperative ICIQ-UI SF scores. Multivariate analysis identified radiotherapy (OR = 3.09; p = 0.049) and preoperative ICIq score (1.49; p = 0.001) as independent predictors of regret. When considering postoperative data, the only independent predictor of regret is the number of pads (OR = 5.58; p = 0.001).
conclusionATOMS implantation provides good objective outcomes; however, some of the patients may present some regret. Preoperative radiotherapy and preoperative continence status are key predictors of regret. These findings highlight the importance of tailored preoperative counseling to manage patient expectations and improve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40892147What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.