ArticleNeuroinformatics2025
Overcoming Site Variability in Multisite fMRI Studies: an Autoencoder Framework for Enhanced Generalizability of Machine Learning Models.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spec-RWKV: A Spectrum-Guided Multi-Scale Recurrent Modeling Framework for Multi-Center Resting-State fMRI-Assisted Diagnosis.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Diagnostic classification of children and adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder based on brain functional network characteristics of the dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmark model.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Harmonizing multisite functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data is crucial for eliminating site-specific variability that hinders the generalizability of machine learning models. Traditional harmonization techniques, such as ComBat, depend on additive and multiplicative factors, and may struggle to capture the non-linear interactions between scanner hardware, acquisition protocols, and signal variations between different imaging sites. In addition, these statistical techniques require data from all the sites during their model training which may have the unintended consequence of data leakage for ML models trained using this harmonized data. The ML models trained using this harmonized data may result in low reliability and reproducibility when tested on unseen data sets, limiting their applicability for general clinical usage. In this study, we propose Autoencoders (AEs) as an alternative for harmonizing multisite fMRI data. Our designed and developed framework leverages the non-linear representation learning capabilities of AEs to reduce site-specific effects while preserving biologically meaningful features. Our evaluation using Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange I (ABIDE-I) dataset, containing 1,035 subjects collected from 17 centers demonstrates statistically significant improvements in leave-one-site-out (LOSO) cross-validation evaluations. All AE variants (AE, SAE, TAE, and DAE) significantly outperformed the baseline mode (p < 0.01), with mean accuracy improvements ranging from 3.41% to 5.04%. Our findings demonstrate the potential of AEs to harmonize multisite neuroimaging data effectively enabling robust downstream analyses across various neuroscience applications while reducing data-leakage, and preservation of neurobiological features. Our open-source code is made available at https://github.com/pcdslab/Autoencoder-fMRI-Harmonization .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.