Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40892125›Full record

SynthesisActa neurologica Belgica2025

Risk of psychosis following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Akinwale Aguda, Ioannis Mavroudis

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akinwale AgudaPsychiatry of Learning disability, Health Education Yorkshire and the Humber, Hull, UK. waleaguda@yahoo.com.
Ioannis MavroudisDepartment of Neuroscience, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust and Leeds University, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), commonly known as concussion, has historically been regarded as a transient and benign condition. However, recent studies suggest it may increase the risk of long-term psychiatric outcomes, including psychosis. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the association between mTBI and subsequent risk of psychosis.

methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar was conducted through June 2025. Studies were eligible if they included individuals with a history of mTBI, a non-TBI control group, and reported psychosis-related outcomes with estimable risk measures. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using the metafor package in R. Risk of bias and publication bias were assessed, and meta-regression was conducted to explore moderators such as adjustment status and effect size type.

resultsSeven studies comprising pediatric and adult populations were included. The pooled risk ratio (RR) for psychosis following mTBI was 1.57 (95% CI: 1.28-1.91, p < 0.001), indicating a statistically significant association. The 95% prediction interval (1.03-2.38) suggests generalizability across future studies. No significant publication bias was detected (Egger's test p = 0.10). Meta-regression found no difference between adjusted and unadjusted estimates (p = 0.802). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.

conclusionsmTBI is associated with a moderate but statistically significant increase in the risk of psychosis. Given the prevalence of mTBI in the general population, these findings highlight the need for long-term psychiatric monitoring and preventive strategies, particularly in youth and high-risk individuals.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionPsychotic DisordersHumansRisk FactorsConcussionMeta-analysisMild traumatic brain injuryNeuropsychiatryPsychosisRisk factorSchizophreniaSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.