ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2025
Zilucoplan in myasthenic crisis refractory to conventional treatment: a report of two cases.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zilucoplan as a rescue therapy in myasthenic crisis: a case description and summary of early report experiences.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Complement Inhibition Therapy in Myasthenic Crisis-A Multicentre Retrospective Analysis of 17 Cases From Germany.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of zilucoplan in patients with anti-AChR myasthenia gravis: A retrospective cohort study in France.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Zilucoplan in refractory myasthenic crisis and its prodromal stages: a novel therapeutic perspective.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
40892124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.