ArticleSurgery today2026
Impact of the learning curve on the outcomes of robotic surgery in obese patients with rectal cancer.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk analysis of additional procedures concomitantly with totally endoscopic mitral valve repair.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Expanding the role of robotic surgery: Non-inferiority of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in overweight patients with bladder cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOne of the challenges in performing surgery on obese patients with rectal cancer is the prolonged operation time. This study investigates whether or not this issue can be overcome through the surgeon's learning curve as they become proficient in robotic surgery.
methodsA retrospective review of 396 consecutive robotic procedures. The cases were divided into a learning phase (LP) group (first 20 cases) and a stabilized phase (SP) group (from case 21 onward). Patients were divided into obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
resultsIn the LP group, obese patients had significantly longer operative times (329 min vs. 289 min) and greater blood loss (10 g [0-50] vs. 10 g [0-12]) than non-obese patients. In the SP group, the perioperative outcomes, including operation time, were similar between the two patient groups.
conclusionThis study suggests that during the early phase of the learning curve, operation time may be prolonged in obese patients. However, once the learning curve stabilizes, the issue of prolonged operative time can be overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40892105What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.