ReviewArchives of toxicology2025
Revolutionizing toxicological risk assessment: integrative advances in new approach methodologies (NAMs) and precision toxicology.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChemSkin DB 2.0: a comprehensive reference chemical database for skin corrosion and irritation.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- Network toxicology deciphers micro- and nanoplastics-mediated mixture hazard, predictive risk assessment, and regulatory translation.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Experimental models of chemical carcinogenesis: bridging toxicology and preclinical pharmacology.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
- "The Dose Makes the Poison": Relevance of Paracelsus's Principle for Modern Chemical Hazard Assessment with New Approach Methodologies.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Advances in Nanotechnology-Based Topical Delivery Systems for Skincare Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Modelling an alternative lipophilicity scale of bisphenols using biomimetic chromatography: Relevance to membrane-driven baseline toxicity.ADMET & DMPK · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Chromatography as a High-Throughput Tool for Screening Bioaccumulation and Acute Aquatic Toxicity of Pesticides.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional toxicological paradigms, reliant on animal testing and simplistic in vitro models, face significant limitations, including prolonged timelines, high costs, and poor translational predictability due to interspecies differences. This review highlights the transformative potential of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in overcoming these challenges. Key advancements include Organ-on-a-Chip (OoC) platforms that emulate human organ physiology and multi-organ crosstalk, significantly improving predictive accuracy. Integration of multi-omics technologies (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics) provides unprecedented mechanistic insights into toxicity pathways. Computational toxicology, leveraging machine learning and QSAR modeling, enables high-throughput hazard prioritization and risk prediction. While NAMs offer human-relevant, efficient alternatives for chemical safety evaluation, critical bottlenecks remain. These involve insufficient physiological complexity in current in vitro models, interpretability limitations of AI-driven approaches, challenges in quantifying mixture toxicity and low-dose effects, and a lag in regulatory adoption. Emerging strategies like probabilistic risk assessment, AI-driven exposomics, and tiered testing paradigms hold promise for addressing chemical mixture risks and personalized exposures. Future progress requires interdisciplinary collaboration to refine microphysiological systems, harmonize regulatory frameworks with scientific innovation, and establish open-access data repositories, paving the way for precision toxicology and sustainable chemical risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40892062What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.