ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Comprehensive Insights into Tracheoesophageal Fistula Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Histological and transcriptomic changes associated with matrix metalloproteinase 9 upregulation in rat esophageal fistula.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Congenital aerodigestive fistula with extraordinarily delayed adult presentation: a case report and review of endoscopic closure for bronchoesophageal fistula.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Right pneumothorax during endoscopic balloon dilation for oesophageal stricture following tracheoesophageal fistula surgery: a case report.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- A case report of lymphoma presenting initially with tracheoesophageal fistula and literature review.Medicine · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Insights into Tracheoesophageal Fistula Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) represents a pathological connection between the trachea and esophagus, classified into congenital and acquired categories. Congenital TEF arises from embryological malformations, often coexisting with esophageal atresia (EA), while acquired TEF primarily stems from malignancies, radiotherapy, or trauma. This condition disrupts normal anatomical functions, leading to significant clinical issues, such as aspiration, respiratory infections, and malnutrition. The current review consolidates findings on the etiology, classification, and pathological mechanisms of TEF, emphasizing how genetic, developmental, and external factors shape its occurrence and progression. Diagnostic advancements, including radiological imaging, endoscopic evaluations, and newer monitoring techniques, have refined clinical assessment. Treatment paradigms for TEF vary from minimally invasive endoscopic interventions, to traditional open and innovative surgical approaches. Conservative management, such as nutritional and anti-infective therapies, remains vital, especially for milder cases. Emerging therapies in regenerative medicine-such as tissue-engineered scaffolds and platelet-rich plasmaoffer transformative potential for refractory cases. Future advancements are oriented toward exploring 3D printing, artificial intelligence, and precision medicine. The necessity of multidisciplinary collaboration is underscored in optimizing holistic patient care. While significant progress has improved cure rates and long-term outcomes, continued research on innovative technologies and clinical trials addressing knowledge gaps in long-term efficacy remains crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.