ArticleBirth defects research2025
Leveraging Health Insurance Claims Data to Complement the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Surveillance System for Birth Defects.
Article in Birth defects research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using administrative healthcare databases to estimate the prevalence of spina bifida across the lifespan: Challenges and opportunities.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBirth defect surveillance can help identify temporo-spatial clusters and teratogenic signals to inform subsequent investigations or interventions. In the United States, state surveillance systems exist but collect limited information, prompting a complementary use of health insurance claims data to describe national birth defect prevalence trends and investigate signals.
methodsThe Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters (MarketScan) database was used to identify liveborn infants from 2016 to 2022, with linkage to maternal health care records during pregnancy. Birth defects were identified using ICD-10-CM codes recorded in the first 3 months of life, and prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals were generated for birth defect categories and select birth defects.
resultsThe study population included 943,855 liveborn infants. From 2016 to 2022, the prevalence increased for cardiac, central nervous system, ear, genital, urinary, musculoskeletal, and limb birth defect categories. Stable prevalence over the study period was observed for chromosomal, oral cleft, respiratory, gastrointestinal, vascular, and eye defects. For specific defects, we observed an increased prevalence of both ankyloglossia and lip-tie over the study period and a transient higher prevalence of omphalocele over 2017 and 2018. Within genital birth defects, we observed increasing prevalence trends for congenital malformations of the penis, while hypospadias and cryptorchidism remained relatively stable.
conclusionHealth care utilization databases can complement existing surveillance systems by generating, confirming, or refuting signals based on ecological trends or clusters. The availability of patient information in claims databases can allow for further investigation of signals to inform birth defect etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.