ArticleThe oncologist2025
Outcomes of palliative porto-mesenteric venous stenting in unresectable pancreatic malignancies.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE AND
objectivePancreatic cancer can lead to severe stenosis of the portomesenteric venous (PV/SMV) confluence due to extrinsic compression or direct invasion. This can result in venous hypertension associated with post-prandial abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, and ascites. In patients with unresectable tumors, transhepatic PV/SMV stenting has been reported; however, its safety and efficacy are poorly understood. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsAll unresectable pancreatic cancer patients referred to Interventional Radiology to undergo palliative transhepatic PV/SMV stenting (2011-2024) were collected. Patient demographics, CT scans, transhepatic venograms, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. INTERVENTION, MAIN OUTCOMES AND
resultsIn total, 129 patients were included; 92% had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Tumors were unresectable due to unreconstructable vascular involvement, metastatic disease, or poor performance status. Nearly 81% were symptomatic, while the remaining 24 asymptomatic patients presented with significant venous hypertensive varices and collaterals on imaging. Complete venous occlusion was seen in 39% of patients at the PV, the SMV, or the PV/SMV confluence; 97% of procedures were successful, with 4 technical failures at obtaining distal venous wire access. Adverse events occurred in 4 patients. Radiological follow-up was available in 94% of patients. Post-procedural primary stent patency was 80% at a median follow-up time of 20 months. Follow-up was available in 102 of the 105 symptomatic patients, with 85% reporting an improvement in symptoms. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Palliative transhepatic PV/SMV stenting is a technically feasible and safe procedure in well-selected patients. Symptoms improvement can be seen in most patients. High-volume centers should consider this technique for patients with unresectable tumors who present with symptomatic stenosis or short segment occlusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.