Observational studyThe Australian journal of rural health2025
Patient-Reported Cataract Outcomes After the Introduction of the Griffith Ophthalmology Project in Regional Australia.
Observational study in The Australian journal of rural health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-Reported Cataract Outcomes After the Introduction of the Griffith Ophthalmology Project in Regional Australia.The Australian journal of rural health · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of the Griffith Ophthalmology Project in improving visual acuity and quality of life (QoL) among cataract surgery patients in regional New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
designRetrospective observational study.
settingGriffith Base Hospital's Department of Ophthalmology in the Western Murrumbidgee Local Health District (MLHD).
participantsThe 135 patients (168 eyes) undergoing cataract surgery between March 2022 and July 2023 completed QoL surveys.
main outcome measuresChanges in vision-related QoL (assessed by National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire; NEI-VFQ), health-related QoL (assessed by EuroQol 5-Dimensional 5-Level survey; EQ-5D-5L), visual acuity, and surgical waiting times.
methodsPatients completed the NEI-VFQ and EQ-5D-5L surveys before and/or after surgery. Pre- and post-operative visual acuity and waiting list data were collected and analysed.
resultsEI-VFQ data showed significant enhancements in 11 of 12 QoL subscales (including social functioning and mental health) as well as the composite QoL score. EQ-5D-5L results indicated improvements in all five dimensions, with overall health-related QoL significantly increased. Visual acuity improved significantly, the surgical waitlist was reduced from 123 to 10 patients, and waiting times decreased from 15 to 2 months.
conclusionsThe Griffith Ophthalmology Project significantly improved visual and QoL outcomes for cataract surgery patients in regional NSW and reduced surgical waiting times. This model of utilising visiting specialists and collaborative local support may serve as a template for sustainable regional healthcare services in Australia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.