ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
Association between occupational dust exposure and asthma prevalence in a nationally representative US population.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study sought to examine the relationship between exposure to different types of workplace dust (mineral dust, organic dust, exhaust fumes, and other fumes) and the prevalence of asthma in a nationally representative sample of the population in the United States.MethodsUsing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2012, we analyzed data of 16,841 participants after exclusions based on specific criteria. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between dust exposure and asthma prevalence after adjusting for demographic and health-related covariates.ResultsOur findings indicate that exposure to various types of dust is positively associated with the prevalence of asthma. This association remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, race, and other covariates. Notably, subgroup analysis revealed that females are more susceptible to asthma from dust exposure than males. In addition, individuals with higher body mass index and older age are more likely to have asthma due to dust inhalation.ConclusionThis study underscores the need for targeted occupational health interventions and policies, especially for high-risk groups such as females, those with higher body weight, and older individuals. Further longitudinal studies are recommended to establish causal relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.