ArticleJournal of vision2025
Virtual street crossing and scanning behavior in people with hemianopia: A step toward successful crossings.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cycling with hemianopia to explore road user detection and scanning behaviour in virtual reality.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individuals with homonymous hemianopia (HH) may benefit from adopting compensatory crossing and scanning strategies to successfully cross streets. In this study, we explored the effect of HH on street crossing outcomes, crossing behavior and scanning behavior in a virtual environment. Individuals with real HH (N = 18), unimpaired vision (N = 18), and simulated HH (N = 18) crossed a virtual street displayed through a head-mounted display. Virtual cars approached from both directions, traveling at a speed of either 30 or 50 km/h. Participants' crossing and scanning behaviors were recorded and analyzed across groups and the two car speeds. Although individuals with real and simulated HH took more time to cross compared to individuals with unimpaired vision depending on the car speed, the number of collisions and time-to-contact after crossings did not differ between groups. We observed no differences in the selection of car gaps, crossing initiation, and scanning behavior between groups. Our findings suggest that individuals with real and simulated HH align their crossing behavior to their visuomotor capabilities by using varying compensatory strategies. HH did not alter scanning behavior before crossing a virtual street. Despite its current shortcomings, virtual reality holds promise for street crossing research and rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.