Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40891781›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Novel BEST1 Variant Characterization in a Large French Cohort in Light of Updated Bestrophin-1 Structure-Function Correlation.

Joan Bitan, Anaïs F Poncet, Claire Lecigne, Aurore Devos, Isabelle Meunier, Xavier Zanlonghi, Olivier Grunewald, Vasily Smirnov, Claire-Marie Dhaenens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joan BitanUniversity of Lille, INSERM, CHU-Lille, U1172 - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Research Center (LilNCog), Lille, France.
Anaïs F PoncetUniversity of Lille, INSERM, CHU-Lille, U1172 - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Research Center (LilNCog), Lille, France.
Claire LecigneUniversity of Lille, INSERM, CHU-Lille, U1172 - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Research Center (LilNCog), Lille, France.
Aurore DevosUniversity of Lille, INSERM, CHU-Lille, U1172 - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Research Center (LilNCog), Lille, France.
Isabelle MeunierInstitute for Neurosciences of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
Xavier ZanlonghiService d'Ophtalmologie, Centre de compétence maladie rare, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, Bretagne, France.
Olivier GrunewaldUniversity of Lille, INSERM, CHU-Lille, U1172 - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Research Center (LilNCog), Lille, France.
Vasily SmirnovUniversity of Lille, INSERM, CHU-Lille, U1172 - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Research Center (LilNCog), Lille, France.
Claire-Marie DhaenensUniversity of Lille, INSERM, CHU-Lille, U1172 - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition Research Center (LilNCog), Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To update knowledge on bestrophin-1 structure and function with the aim of assessing the pathogenicity of variants reported in the Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD) and in a large French cohort of bestrophinopathies. Methods: All unique variants reported in the latest version (October 2024) of the BEST1-LOVD database were uploaded and curated. We described all BEST1 variants identified in French patients analyzed at Lille University Hospital, between 2008 and 2024. A comprehensive analysis of each variant was performed based on in silico tools (at DNA, RNA, and protein levels), as well as a literature review providing clinical data and functional assays. All of these data were used to classify the variant pathogenicity according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria. Results: We detailed 488 variants from the LOVD. Among 450 French patients, we identified 150 different variants, 40 of which were novel. We classified only eight variants as variants of unknown significance, four of which were already in the LOVD. We identified specific recurrent variants in the French population: p.(Gly26Asp), p.(Val90Met), p.(Val137Met), and p.(Ile230del), the last of which was present in 17 patients (3.8%). All new variants cause changes in chemical interactions within the protein and are associated with clinical pictures of bestrophinopathy. Conclusions: The study and comparison of these two large cohorts highlight variants specific to the French population, as well as differences in protein distribution, which are undoubtedly influenced by several population-specific factors. Through multiple in silico analyses, we were able to reclassify 93.3% of variants as likely pathogenic or pathogenic, thereby strengthening clinical diagnoses.

Indexed as

BestrophinsEye Diseases, HereditaryMutationRetinal DiseasesAdultChildCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedStructure-Activity RelationshipBEST1 protein, humanBestrophins

Identifiers

PMID40891781
PMCPMC12410269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.