ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Optimizing Early Ophthalmology Clinical Trials: Home OCT and Modeling Can Reduce Sample Size by 20% to 40.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Early-stage clinical trials for major retinal diseases face challenges due to substantial interpatient variability, end points with high intrapatient variability, and prolonged follow-up periods required to detect treatment effects. This study explores whether integrating home optical coherence tomography (OCT) monitoring with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling can reduce clinical trial sample size. Methods: A population PK/PD model was developed using longitudinal central subfield thickness data from a home OCT study. Monte Carlo simulations and bootstrapping were used to evaluate the impact of different monitoring strategies on sample size requirements to detect a simulated effect size of approximately 50-µm central subfield thickness reduction over an active comparator drug. Results: To reliably detect this effect, traditional biweekly in-clinic monitoring required 41 to 54 patients per arm, whereas home OCT monitoring only required 33 to 35 patients per arm, representing a 20% to 40% sample size reduction. Conclusions: These findings highlight the potential for home OCT and PK/PD modeling to improve trial efficiency and patient convenience while maintaining statistical power. Translational Relevance: By reducing sample size requirements while maintaining statistical power, this approach can streamline clinical trials, expediting the development of new retinal therapies and improving patient access to treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.