ReviewThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2025
Translational milestones in urologic pathology: integrating molecular diagnostics across cancer types.
Review in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In its first decade, The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research has become a leading source of translational studies advancing molecular diagnostics in cancer, particularly in urologic pathology. This commentary highlights recent contributions that collectively place precision oncology at the forefront of pathology research. One review examines cancer stem cells in renal cell carcinoma, emphasizing the complexity of cellular plasticity and the tumor microenvironment in driving resistance and recurrence. In prostate cancer, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) regulators, including Twist, Slug, and Snail, are identified as synergistic markers of poor prognosis, linked to hypoxia and invasiveness. Another review details the integration of homologous recombination repair gene testing into clinical workflows, supporting targeted treatment strategies with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. In pediatric oncology, TP53 alterations in Wilms tumor are shown to occur beyond anaplastic cases, expanding their prognostic significance. Advances in molecular subtyping are also demonstrated in bladder cancer, where transcriptomic profiling could enable tailored neoadjuvant therapy. In clear cell renal cell carcinoma, re-evaluation of a prognostic model revealed that while necrosis or sarcomatoid differentiation correlated with poor outcomes, only DNA methylation markers improved prognostic accuracy, underscoring their utility for biopsy-based risk stratification. Finally, digital spatial profiling of sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma reveals an immunosuppressive microenvironment with CD163-positive cells, implicating them in EMT and aggressive phenotype. Together, these studies highlight the transformative role of integrated molecular diagnostics in guiding individualized therapies and improving outcomes in urologic cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.