Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40891653›Full record

ReviewQuarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)2025

Time after time: Voice perception from first impressions to identity recognition.

Nadine Lavan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nadine LavanCentre for Brain and Behaviour, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7569-0817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When we hear someone speak, we do not just hear 'a voice'. If the voice is unfamiliar, we form an often complex first impression by inferring various characteristics about the person. If the voice is familiar, at least to some degree, we may be able to recognise and identify the person to whom the voice belongs. Even though first impression formation and identity recognition can thus be seen as being situatied at two opposing ends of a 'familiarity continuum', first impressions and identity recognition functionally serve the same purpose: making sense of who another person is. Theories and empirical work examining impression formation and identity perception from voices have, however, developed largely in isolation from one another, with relatively limited cross-talk. In this paper, I will review some recent findings from the literature on first impression formation from unfamiliar voices and voice identity learning and recognition from familiar(ised) voices. I will ask how impression perception and identity perception may interact and interface with one another along this 'familiarity continuum' between completely unfamiliar and very familiar voices, trying to bring together these two literatures. Specifically, I will consider what happens to first impressions when we become increasingly familiar with a person, whether first impressions might have an impact on how (well) voices can be learned and recognised, and when and how identity recognition might take over from ad-hoc impression formation.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionRecognition, PsychologyVoiceHumansfamiliarityfirst impressionsidentity recognitionperson perceptionVoice perception

Identifiers

PMID40891653
PMCPMC12638452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.