ReviewBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Sepsis toxicity network reconstruction-Dynamic signaling and multi-organ injury: A review.
Review in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- ProbioticGut microbes · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of machine learning-based prediction-modelling for initial vancomycin serum concentrations in septic ICU patients using clinical health record data.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial-related biomarkers as the diagnostic markers in sepsis induced acute respiratory distress syndrome.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Crosstalk between innate immune signaling pathways and integrated TLR, NLRP3 inflammasome, cGAS-STING, and NF-κB networks in sepsis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Mitochondria-immunometabolism in sepsis-induced liver injury: mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Revisiting ventilator-induced lung injury: from mechanical power to immunometabolic interaction.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Autophagy-ferroptosis crosstalk in sepsis: metabolic pathways, redox injury, and host-directed antioxidant nanomedicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Cell death in sepsis: unveiling new perspectives on organ dysfunction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Role of the gut-lung axis in sepsis and the effect of probiotics on pulmonary complications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Decoding the molecular mechanisms of pyroptosis and its therapeutic development prospects.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is a complex systemic disease in which systemic toxicity-arising from inflammation-immune dysregulation, oxidative stress, programmed cell death (apoptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis), and metabolic reprogramming-drives multi-organ injury. The aim of this review was to synthesize how signaling pathways evolve within and between key organs (lungs, liver, kidneys, heart) and to evaluate whether multi-omics integration and network modeling can identify critical toxic nodes and predict disease progression. We conducted a narrative review of English-language mechanistic studies published between 2015 and 2025 in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, supplemented by bibliography screening, while excluding case reports, conference abstracts, and non-mechanistic work. The evidence depicts a high-dimensional systemic network that remodels over time, with early pro-inflammatory modules transitioning toward immunosuppression and organ-specific injury patterns, while inter-organ propagation is mediated by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), exosomes, and metabolites. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, via reactive oxygen species (ROS), couple to pyroptosis and ferroptosis to reinforce toxicity loops, and computational approaches such as dynamic Bayesian networks (DBN) and graph neural networks (GNN) delineate regulatory hubs and support forecasting. Therapeutic progress has concentrated on nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), the NOD-, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome, and glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), alongside artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted personalized toxicity maps and dynamic early-warning systems, though challenges remain in specificity, safety, and resistance. In conclusion, sepsis can be conceived as a temporally staged systemic toxicity network, and when combined with multi-omics, DBN/GNN modeling, and AI-enabled decision support, this framework offers a path toward individualized, mechanism-based care, while requiring rigorous validation to ensure clinical durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.