ArticleCancer discovery2025
Defining the Antitumor Mechanism of Action of a Clinical-stage Compound as a Selective Degrader of the Nuclear Pore Complex.
Article in Cancer discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential protein expression analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry data using DEqMS.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Nucleoporins in Cancer: Functional Roles and Therapeutic Opportunities.Cancer discovery · 2026Article
- A single-cell lens into the co-evolution of genotypes and phenotypes in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Redirecting TRIM21 with TRIMTACs for the targeted degradation of multimeric proteins.The FEBS journal · 2026Review
- The molecular basis for nuclear pore destruction by a proximity-inducing molecular glue.Cell chemical biology · 2026Article
- Disrupting the Undruggable: Emerging Modalities for Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions in Oncology.Biology · 2026Review
- A clinical-stage oncology compound selectively targets drug-resistant cancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer cells are acutely dependent on nuclear transport due to elevated transcriptional activity, suggesting an unrealized opportunity for selective therapeutic inhibition of the nuclear pore complex (NPC). Through large-scale phenotypic profiling of cancer cell lines, genome-scale functional genomic modifier screens, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics, we discovered that the clinical drug PRLX-93936 is a molecular glue that binds and reprograms the TRIM21 ubiquitin ligase to degrade the NPC. Upon compound-induced TRIM21 recruitment, the nuclear pore is ubiquitylated and degraded, resulting in the loss of short-lived cytoplasmic mRNA transcripts and the induction of cancer cell apoptosis. Direct compound binding to TRIM21 was confirmed via surface plasmon resonance and X-ray crystallography, whereas compound-induced TRIM21-nucleoporin complex formation was demonstrated through multiple orthogonal approaches in cells and in vitro. Phenotype-guided optimization yielded compounds with 10-fold greater potency and drug-like properties, along with robust pharmacokinetics and efficacy against pancreatic cancer xenografts and patient-derived organoids. SIGNIFICANCE: This study establishes the cancer therapeutic potential of optimized TRIM21 molecular glues to degrade the NPC and underscores the value of reexamining drugs with previously unknown mechanisms using current technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.