ReviewClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Evaluation of Early Versus Delayed DOACs Initiation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with AF.
Review in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal timing for initiating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) following acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a critical clinical question. This review evaluates findings from three pivotal randomized controlled trials-TIMING, ELAN, and OPTIMAS-comparing early versus delayed DOAC initiation in AF patients with AIS. Collectively, these trials provide strong evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of early initiation of DOACs in patients with AIS and AF. The TIMING trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of early DOAC initiation (≤4 days) compared to delayed initiation (5-10 days), with numerically lower rates of ischemic stroke and no cases of symptomatic ICH. The ELAN trial further corroborated these findings, showing no significant difference in the composite outcome of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or major hemorrhage between early initiation (≤48 h for minor/moderate strokes; days 6-7 for major strokes) and later initiation (days 3-4 to 12-14). OPTIMAS, the largest trial to date, confirmed the non-inferiority of early initiation (≤4 days) versus delayed initiation (7-14 days), without an increased risk of symptomatic ICH and with comparable rates of recurrent ischemic events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.