ArticleCurrent eye research2026
Could a Preservative Have Prevented the Extremely-Drug Resistant
Article in Current eye research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe 2023 outbreak of extensively drug resistant (XDR) MATERIALS AND
methodsTime-kill studies were performed in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) and phosphate buffered saine (PBS) on 3 PA strains including the XDRPA outbreak strain. Preservatives assessed were benzalkonium chloride (BAK) 0.04%, 0.01%, and 0.004%, Polyquaterium-1 (Polyquad) (PQ) 0.001%, Sodium Perborate (SP) 0.1%, and EDTA 0.1%. In addition, time-kill assays were performed using preserved and a non-preserved commercially-available artificial tears.
resultsBAK 0.04% and 0.01%, and PQ eliminated all PA isolates in both media after 4 h. BAK 0.004% and SP eliminated all PA strains in PBS at 1 h but did not produce bactericidal 99.9% decreases in MHB over 24 h. EDTA did not produce a bactericidal effect in either media. Artificial tears containing sorbic acid 0.25% and edetate disodium 0.1%, PQ, SP, and PURITE eliminated the PA strains within 24 h.
conclusionsSeveral common preservatives were effective in eliminating PA strains including the outbreak strain CDC1270. Preservative efficacy was delayed or inhibited in rich media (MHB) compared to PBS. These results suggest that the 2023 outbreak could have been prevented by using a common preservative in the artificial tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.