ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025
Liquid Chromatographic and Mass Spectrometric Methods for Quantitative Proteomic Analysis from Single-Cell and Nanogram-Level Samples.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modification of a Low-Cost Pipetting Robot for Nanoliter Liquid Handling and Autosampling for Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid chromatography (LC) and mass spectrometry (MS) are two critical components in proteomics. Advances in methods for both LC and MS have significantly enhanced protein identification and quantifications of limited amounts of proteins, particularly at the picogram-to-nanogram level of proteins. In this study, we explored various LC conditions and MS platforms to optimize protein identification and quantification using data-independent acquisition (DIA). Our investigation focused on evaluating the sensitivity for protein identification, reproducibility of quantification, and robustness across multiple models, specifically focused on analyzing proteins at pico- to nanogram levels, with an emphasis on single-cell proteomics. We further applied our approach for the proteomic analysis of HeLa single cells. Overall, we identified and quantified over 6300 proteins at the single-cell level amount of peptides with a coefficient of variation (CV) of less than 20%, and detected up to 5000 proteins from isolated single HeLa cell samples. Finally, we analyzed docetaxel-treated and nontreated PC3 cells to reveal proteome changes at the single-cell level. This study provides a comprehensive technical evaluation for LC-MS methods in protein identification and quantification for analytical applications involving single-cell proteomics from the picogram to nanogram level of proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.