Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40891139›Full record

ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2025

Patient experiences of occupational formulation: It's about getting to know me.

Lorrae Mynard, Ellie Fossey, Louise Farnworth, Genevieve Pepin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorrae MynardDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2271-1746
Ellie FosseyDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8002-5763
Louise FarnworthDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Monash University, Frankston, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-4706
Genevieve PepinOccupational Science and Therapy, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8382-160X

Funding

Occupational Therapy Australia Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOccupational formulation is a synthesis of assessment information that describes a person's occupational participation and needs, to guide collaborative goal and therapy planning. This study aimed to explore patients' experiences of creating occupational formulations and reflecting on them in an Australian secure forensic hospital.

methodThis qualitative descriptive study is part of a larger participatory action research project aiming to implement occupational formulation and evaluate its use within a forensic occupational therapy service. An occupational therapist researcher and lived experience worker co-interviewed patients who had completed an occupational formulation. A semi-structured interview guide and chart stimulated recall were used to support discussion with each participant about their occupational formulation. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed, and reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Extensive consultation with members of the lived experience, occupational therapy and social work teams, and the hospital's consumer advisory group informed the design and implementation of this study.

findingsTen forensic patients, including nine male and one female (aged 30s-60s) from four units, participated in interviews. Three themes were developed. The first, "a getting-to-know-you piece," describes how participants viewed the occupational formulation and the process of developing it. The second, "talking about losses and limitations" reflects the challenges within the forensic system that participants highlighted through creating and reading their occupational formulations, while the third, "valuing its potential" depicts how the occupational formulations were used and could potentially be used.

conclusionOverall, participants viewed occupational formulation positively and valued being heard and understood. The approach benefited patients and the therapeutic relationship, supporting collaboration and potentially shifting power within the patient-therapist relationship. The study also identified missed opportunities to support further reflection and collaborative progress review. Suggestions were made for strengthening the development, documentation, and review of occupational formulations and goals. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Occupational therapists try to learn about people's daily lives to understand what matters to each person and set therapy goals together. One way they do this is through a process called an occupational formulation. This is a written summary made with the person to show what they need and want in their life. This study looked at how patients felt about using occupational formulation in a secure forensic hospital. This is a new way of working, so we wanted to learn more about how it was used and what patients thought about it. The study was planned with help from people with lived experience, occupational therapists, social workers, and the hospital's Consumer Advisory Group. An occupational therapist and a lived experience worker interviewed 10 patients about their occupational formulations. The interviews were recorded and written down. Researchers then looked at what the patients said to find common ideas. Three themes were identified: getting to know the person, talking about losses and limitations, and how the formulation helped or could be helpful. Most patients said the process was helpful. It made it easier to work with their occupational therapist and talk about what was important to them. They also wanted more chances to check in on their goals. Based on what we learned, we made suggestions to help therapists improve how they create and review occupational formulations with patients. More research could look at how this works in other places.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapyAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchchart stimulated recallco‐interviewingcollaborationforensic mental healthlived experienceModel of Human Occupationoccupational formulationpeer interviewingsecure hospital

Identifiers

PMID40891139
PMCPMC12402748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.