ArticleMedical physics2025
Towards quantitative ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) for radiation dose measurement: Validation from simulations to experiments.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shape-optimized Model-based Reconstruction Algorithm for Radiacoustic Imaging.Applied physics letters · 2026Article
- Ionizing radiation acoustic beam localization: one step towards "proton surgery".medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Towards quantitative ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI) for radiation dose measurement: Validation from simulations to experiments.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn clinical radiation therapy (RT), accurately quantifying the delivered radiation dose to the targeted tumors and surrounding tissues is essential for evaluating treatment outcomes. Ionizing radiation acoustic imaging (iRAI), a novel passive and non-invasive imaging technique, has the potential to provide real-time in vivo radiation dose mapping during RT. However, current iRAI technology does not account for spatial variations in the detection sensitivity of the ultrasound transducer used to capture the iRAI signals, leading to significant errors in dose mapping. PURPOSE: This paper presents the first detection sensitivity-compensated quantitative iRAI approach for measuring deposited radiation dose, aiming at improving dose mapping accuracy.
methodsDetection sensitivity maps for the 2D matrix array transducer (MAT) were generated through both computational studies and experimental measurements. First, the Field II MATLAB toolbox was used to simulate the acoustic fields generated by the 2D MAT at various focal angles in the region of interest. Second, the prototype 2D MAT was applied to experimentally measure the acoustic signals generated by pulsed laser point sources distributed throughout the same volume as in the simulation. Then, in vitro experiments were conducted using homogeneous soft-tissue phantoms, where x-ray beams with square fields and a C-shaped treatment plan were separately delivered via a clinical linear accelerator (LINAC). Additionally, the propagation of acoustic waves induced by the x-ray beams with square fields was simulated using the K-Wave MATLAB toolbox. Correction factors derived from both the simulated and experimental sensitivity maps were applied to compensate for sensitivity-induced discrepancies in the iRAI reconstruction results. Dose distributions in uncompensated and sensitivity-compensated iRAI volumetric images were compared across various beam positions and field sizes. The agreement between the iRAI images and the treatment plan was quantitatively evaluated using structural similarity index measure (SSIM) and gamma index analysis.
resultsThe experimental results, including the detection sensitivity map and iRAI measurements of x-ray beams with square fields, showed strong agreement with the corresponding simulated outcomes. Following compensation, the relative amplitudes of all iRAI images for beams targeting different positions converged toward 1. The compensated iRAI images revealed greater agreement with the treatment plan in dose distribution, compared to the pre-compensation images. This improvement was further supported by global gamma index analysis, which showed an increase in the 5%/5 mm dose difference (DD) /distance-to-agreement (DTA) passing rate from 56.86% to 78.24% after compensation, indicating improved accuracy in reconstructing the dose distribution.
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that addressing inhomogeneities in transducer detection sensitivity significantly enhances the accuracy of radiation dose mapping by iRAI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.