Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40891052›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Impact of hypertensive disorders on disease progression in pregnancies affected by early-onset fetal growth restriction.

Basia Chmielewska, Claire Pegorie, Michelle Jie, Nishita Mehta, Daniel McStay, Amar Bhide, Basky Thilaganathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Basia ChmielewskaFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7021-554X
Claire PegorieFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-1286-415X
Michelle JieFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4122-0996
Nishita MehtaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Epsom and St Helier Hospital University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Daniel McStayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital NHS Trust, Croydon, UK.
Amar BhideFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Basky ThilaganathanFetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5531-4301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFetal growth restriction is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity, often linked to placental insufficiency. Hypertensive disorders frequently coexist with fetal growth restriction and may alter its clinical course. The objective of this study is to examine how hypertensive disorders influence the onset, progression, and timing of birth in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction. Secondary outcomes were indications for delivery and neonatal outcomes. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective cohort study of pregnancies diagnosed with fetal growth restriction prior to 36 weeks' gestation and monitored under the TRUFFLE protocol between January 2013 and July 2024 at a tertiary fetal medicine unit in the UK. Pregnancies were stratified by maternal blood pressure status: normotensive, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, or preexisting chronic hypertension. Clinical characteristics, antenatal surveillance findings, delivery indications, and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups.

resultsOne hundred and ninety-six singleton pregnancies met the inclusion criteria. 68% of the cohort were affected by chronic hypertension or new-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Hypertensive pregnancies had significantly shorter intervals from fetal growth restriction diagnosis to delivery (9 days (IQR 5-19) for chronic hypertension, 12 days (IQR 3-24) for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, 23 days (IQR 8-35) in normotensive pregnancies (p = 0.001)) and earlier gestational age at delivery (29 + 5 weeks (IQR 27 + 3-32 + 3) for chronic hypertension and 30 + 5 weeks (IQR 28 + 4-32 + 6) for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy - versus 32 + 0 weeks (IQR 29 + 1-33 + 6) in normotensive cases; p = 0.023). A higher proportion of hypertensive pregnancies were delivered for maternal indications (37.5% hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, 39.5% chronic hypertension) compared to 14.5% in normotensive pregnancies (p = 0.004), while normotensive pregnancies were more frequently delivered due to abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers (29.0% vs. 14.6% hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, 13.2% chronic hypertension; p = 0.041). Neonates of mothers with chronic hypertension had higher birthweight centiles (p = 0.004), but neonatal outcomes were comparable across all groups.

conclusionsIncidence of hypertension in the context of fetal growth restriction significantly impacts timing and gestational age of delivery and birthweight centile. An integrated approach to combine maternal and fetal monitoring in these pregnancies is required to optimize birth outcomes.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationHypertensionHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPremature BirthAdultBirth WeightChronic DiseaseDisease ProgressionFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaternal AgePlacental CirculationPregnancychronic hypertensionhypertensive disorders of pregnancyplacental insufficiencypreeclampsiaTRUFFLE

Identifiers

PMID40891052
PMCPMC12575163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.