Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40890968›Full record

ArticleHeadache2025

Exploring the relationship between pain catastrophizing and migraine in youth: A longitudinal clinical cohort study.

Alexis Espanioli, Nynke J van den Hoogen, Jonathan Kuziek, Kirsten Sjonnesen, Melanie Noel, Serena L Orr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexis EspanioliDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nynke J van den HoogenDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jonathan KuziekDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kirsten SjonnesenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Melanie NoelAlberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Serena L OrrDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2879-811X

Funding

Alberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryO'Brien Institute for Public Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explored the relationship between pain catastrophizing and migraine-related outcomes (i.e., migraine-related disability and headache frequency) between visits with a neurologist in a clinical population of children and adolescents with migraine.

backgroundEvidence from adult populations suggests that pain catastrophizing, the tendency to magnify the threat value of, and ruminate and feel helpless about, pain may be associated with migraine-related outcomes, but the association in children and adolescents is less clear.

methodsIn this prospective longitudinal clinical cohort study, children and adolescents aged 8-18 years with migraine completed headache questionnaires and a validated measure of pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children) at baseline and initial follow-up visits with a neurologist. Recruitment spanned from May 2019 to July 2023. Headache frequency and migraine-related disability (Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment) were assessed at both visits. Migraine outcomes at follow-up were examined in relation to baseline pain catastrophizing scores in models that controlled for sex, age, preventive treatment use, baseline headache frequency, and baseline disability.

resultsFor this study, 121 consenting participants were included. In models adjusted for age, sex, baseline headache frequency, baseline disability, and preventive treatment use, baseline pain catastrophizing scores were significantly associated with disability scores at follow-up (β = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13-1.48, p = 0.020), but not with headache frequency at follow-up (β = 0.04, 95% CI = -0.10 to 0.19, p = 0.575). When examining the specific subscales of pain catastrophizing in an adjusted model, only baseline pain magnification (β = 6.73, 95% CI = 2.95-10.51, p = 0.001) had a significant association with disability at follow-up, while feelings of helplessness (β = 0.08, 95% CI = -2.11 to 2.27, p = 0.944) and rumination did not (β = -1.83, 95% CI = -4.22 to 0.56, p = 0.133). In a subset of participants with pain catastrophizing measured at both visits (n = 65), pain catastrophizing total and subscale scores did not significantly differ between visits.

conclusionBaseline pain catastrophizing scores were associated with migraine-related disability, but not headache frequency, at follow-up in a clinical population of children and adolescents with migraine. Pain magnification specifically appeared to drive this association. Future studies should aim to replicate our results and to investigate if interventions aimed specifically at reducing pain magnification may help to mitigate migraine-related disability in children and adolescents.

Indexed as

CatastrophizationMigraine DisordersAdolescentChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective Studiescatastrophizingchildren and adolescentsmental healthmigrainepainpediatric

Identifiers

PMID40890968
PMCPMC12455422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.