ArticleGenomics & informatics2025
Statistical learning methods for improving predictive performance in time-dependent survival models.
Article in Genomics & informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A nomogram integrating CTPA parameters and serum biomarkers to predict 30-day mortality and refine risk stratification in non-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for survival models to assess risk factors and time-dependent effects in infectious diseases. However, the Cox proportional hazards (PH) model, which assumes constant covariate effects, struggles to capture disease dynamics. This underscores the need for advanced models that incorporate time-dependent coefficients and covariates for improved accuracy.
methodsTo address the need for modeling time-dependent effects and covariates, we applied a stratified Cox PH model with multiple time intervals to better satisfy the PH assumption. We conducted simulations to evaluate the performance of machine learning and deep learning survival models, including random survival forest (RSF), DeepSurv, and DeepHit. To improve time-dependent effect estimation, we introduced a refined time-interval division and a weighted sum approach for integrated hazard ratios of COVID-19 variants. The event of interest was death, and the specific risk compared was the risk of death from the start of the study to either death or the last follow-up among infected versus uninfected individuals.
resultsOur results showed that increasing the number of time intervals improved predictive accuracy. When the PH assumption held, the Cox PH model outperformed machine learning and deep learning models. Applying our approach to UK Biobank data, expanding time intervals from five to fifteen enhanced performance. The previously reported hazard ratio of 7.333 for the pre-Delta period was refined to 29.359 for the Early variant, 20.734 for EU1, and 4.079 for Alpha, revealing a decline in risk across variants.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that refining time intervals improves the understanding of time-dependent effects in infectious diseases. Incorporating stratified intervals and advanced models enhances risk assessment and predictive accuracy for COVID-19 and other evolving diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.