ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025
Disruption of electrophysiological rhythms and memory impairment in an Alzheimer's transgenic rat model.
Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is one of the most prevalent causes of dementia, characterized by progressive memory loss and cognitive decline. Abnormal electrophysiological patterns, especially interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and high-frequency oscillations (HFOs), have been observed in mouse models of AD and are suggested to contribute to cognitive dysfunction. However, comprehensive evaluations of IEDs across different brain regions are limited, and their impact on cognitive performance and neuropathology remains unclear, particularly in more complex AD models with relevant comorbidities. To address this gap, our study aims to clarify how IEDs and HFOs contribute to cognitive decline and neuropathology in AD, potentially informing the development of new biomarkers for early detection.
methodsWe investigate these effects in an AD (PS1/APP) rat model (FAD+) with coexisting hypertension-associated small vessel disease (SVD), as well as in their transgene-negative littermates (FAD-). We conducted behavioral experiments at 6, 8, and 11 months of animal age, alongside neural signal recordings at 8 and 11 months. AD pathology (neuritic plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau) and novel biomarkers (14-3-3γ) or biomarkers common to both disorders (neuropeptide Y, astrocyte and microglia) were evaluated at the end of the experiment.
resultsSeizures were observed in three out of 14 FAD + rats. IED rates were significantly greater in FAD + rats compared to FAD- at all tested periods, correlating with changes in neuropathological biomarkers. Furthermore, coupling strength between IEDs and HFOs was significantly elevated in FAD + rats, especially during the later stages of disease progression. In addition, FAD + rats exhibited deficits in both learning and recall abilities at both ages, which correlated most strongly with increased IED-HFO coupling strength. No such correlation was observed in the FAD- group.
conclusionOur findings suggest that pathological synchronization between IEDs and HFOs in the hippocampus, along with neuropathological changes in both the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, may contribute to memory dysfunction in AD, highlighting a potential mechanistic link between epileptiform activity, AD biomarker changes, and cognitive decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.