ArticleJournal of foot and ankle research2025
On podiatric surgery.
Article in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On podiatric surgery.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Podiatric surgery is a registered specialty in Australia, supported by nationally accredited training programs and decades of safe, effective practice. Despite this, podiatric surgeons are excluded from public hospitals and government-funded services, eliminating their ability to contribute to high-demand areas of surgical care. This commentary explores systemic barriers to the integration of podiatric surgeons within the Australian health system. It draws on national regulatory frameworks, clinical audit data, and international comparisons including interprofessional agreements in the United Kingdom and United States, to examine how a well-trained but vastly underutilised specialist surgical workforce remains siloed outside public care. Structural reforms would allow podiatric surgeons to participate in multidisciplinary teams, reduce surgical waiting times, and support patients with complex foot and ankle conditions, especially those with conditions such as diabetic foot disease, that are known to deteriorate with time, and patients from marginalised and remote demographics. International examples show that enabling access and removing funding exclusions improve service equity, alleviate surgical bottlenecks, and bring Australia in line with global best practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.