ArticleBMC research notes2025
Exploring perceptions of vitamin D deficiency and cultural influences in people from minority ethnic groups aged 60 + in East London: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the perceptions and attitudes of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and cultural influences in people from minority ethnic groups aged 60 + in East London through thematic analysis of qualitative semi-structured interviews.
resultsNine participants were interviewed (7 in-person, 2 by phone). Participants were recruited by purposive and snowball sampling through East London organisations, local council authorities and website email contacts. A total of 4 themes were generated: vitamin D knowledge, sources of knowledge, barriers to vitamin D intake, and solutions to improve vitamin D intake. Solutions included 2 sub-themes: food fortification and supplementation, and education - further divided into (i) community and (ii) women as targets for education. There was some knowledge of vitamin D, however this was limited as few could name dietary sources of vitamin D. Barriers included cost of supplementation, accessibility to sunshine, and cultural factors (e.g. dietary behaviour, perceptions of sun exposure). Attitudes towards vitamin D supplementation were largely positive, whereas food fortification was more polarising. Targeted education was a suggested key solution, particularly within the community and amongst women - identified as a central figure in most families. Policy makers should engage communities and develop approaches that reflect the needs and characteristics of the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.