ArticleBMC medical education2025
Learning styles or study approaches in medical schools: a study of a pebble thrown into the water.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigates the relationships between medical students’ learning styles and their study approaches. While learning styles have been criticized and debated, study approaches are recognized for their association with academic success. Understanding these dynamics can enhance educational practices in medical education by catering to diverse student needs.
methodsThe study employs a descriptive research model with 1724 medical students using the VARK questionnaire and ASSIST inventory. We applied cluster analysis with the k-means algorithm to group students based on their learning styles. The Chi-square test of independence was used to explore the association between learning styles and study approaches.
resultsKinesthetic and Aural styles were most common, followed by Read-Write. Surface-apathetic was the most frequent study approach, followed by strategic and deep approaches. Multimodal learners showed a strong positive association with the deep approach and a negative one with the strategic approach. Kinesthetic learners also favored the deep approach, while Read-Write learners aligned with the strategic approach.
conclusionsThe findings underscore the importance of recognizing the interaction between medical students’ learning style preferences and their adopted study approaches. These results can guide medical educators in designing more diverse and student-centered pedagogical strategies. Overall, the study highlights the value of promoting learners’ metacognitive awareness and fostering the development of flexible learning strategies rather than rigidly aligning instruction with specific learning styles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.