ArticleBMC nursing2025
The effect of debate-based nursing ethics education on the moral sensitivity and judgment of nursing students.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Network analysis of moral courage, moral resilience, and moral sensitivity among nursing students: a cross sectional survey.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMoral sensitivity and the ability to make ethical judgments are foundational competencies for ethical performance among nursing students. These two moral capabilities are not innate; rather, they must be cultivated through education. The effectiveness of teaching ethical concepts and employing suitable educational methods remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to assess the impact of debate-based nursing ethics training on the moral sensitivity and moral judgment of nursing students.
methodsThis study was conducted as a clinical trial involving 72 undergraduate nursing students. The participants were assigned to two groups: 37 students in the debate-based group and 35 in the lecture group. Demographic information, Lutzen moral sensitivity, and Rest moral judgment questionnaires were administered before the intervention and one month afterward. In the discussion group, students were divided into two subgroups of eighteen, with each subgroup participating in two 3-hour discussion sessions that addressed eleven scenarios focused on ethical challenges in nursing. In the lecture group, the session was conducted as a single four-hour lecture. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16 software, employing paired and independent t-tests.
resultsThe two groups did not differ significantly in terms of demographic variables (P<0.05).Prior to the study two groups, the mean of moral sensitivity were (52.89±19.33) and (54.87±13.32). In addition, the first and third stories of moral judgment did not reveal a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). After the study, the moral sensitivity scores in the lecture group were (73.16±14.23), compared to (86.13±11.48) in the debate-based group. A statistically significant difference was observed in the mean moral judgment scores between the lecture and debate-based groups (P<0.001)
conclusionTeaching nursing ethics through both debate-based and lecture-based methods can enhance the moral sensitivity and judgment of nursing students. However, the debate-based method appears to be more effective. Given the significance of learning the Iranian Code of Nursing Ethics, both methods-particularly the debate-based approach-should be employed based on the educational context and available resources. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir ) on 2024-06-04, with the IRCT ID: IRCT20240215061016N2. ( https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/76848 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.