ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Developing multimodal cervical cancer risk assessment and prediction model based on LMIC hospital patient card sheets and histopathological images.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid Decision-Level Fusion of CNN-Based Deep and Handcrafted Features for Colon Cancer Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a significant global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where access to early diagnostic tools is limited. In Ethiopia, cervical cancer diagnosis often relies on manual interpretation of biopsies, which can be time-consuming and subjective. This study aims to develop a multimodal machine learning model that integrates histopathological images and associated patient clinical records to improve cervical cancer risk prediction and biopsy detection. The dataset comprises 404 biopsy images and corresponding clinical records from 499 patients, collected at Jimma Medical Center. The preprocessing of histopathological images and clinical records involved image enhancement, data augmentation, imputation of missing values, and class balancing techniques. Subsequently, (I) a pre-trained convolutional neural network deep learning (VGG16) model was applied on the histopathological dataset, (II) a Random Forest classifier was trained on the patient clinical records, and (III) a late fusion strategy was employed to integrate the outputs of both classifiers for multimodal analysis. Recursive Feature Elimination was used to identify key predictive factors from the patient data, and the model’s performance was thoroughly validated using accuracy, AUC-ROC curves, and confusion matrices, ensuring reliability across all classes. As a result, convolutional neural networks and Random Forest classifiers achieved accuracies of 91% and 96%, respectively. The integrated multimodal model achieved 92% accuracy, demonstrating enhanced robustness and clinical relevance by combining complementary data sources. These findings suggest that multimodal approaches hold promise for improving cervical cancer diagnostics in resource-limited settings. Future work will focus on validating the model with diverse datasets and integrating it into clinical workflows to support healthcare providers in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.