ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Network analysis of social support and anxiety symptoms among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent research suggests that focusing on specific symptoms, rather than general levels of impairment, may offer a more nuanced understanding of psychopathology. Given the unique social and psychological challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, this study aims to explore the relationships between the three dimensions of perceived social support family support, friend support, and other support-and individual anxiety symptoms among college students. The pandemic context provides an opportunity to examine how different forms of social support may influence specific anxiety symptoms in a time of heightened stress and restricted social interactions.
methodsWe conducted a network analysis of anxiety symptoms and perceived social support in a sample of 4105 college students. The network structures and bridge effects between social support and anxiety symptoms were examined at two time points (T1 and T2). A network comparison test (NCT) was conducted to assess differences in the network structures and bridge centrality indices across the two time points.
resultsIn this sample, perceived social support was significantly associated with anxiety symptoms. Bridge centrality analysis indicated that, across both networks, family support generally correlated with lower levels of certain anxiety symptoms, serving as a protective factor. In contrast, friend support showed a mixed pattern-positively associated with some symptoms (e.g., irritability) but negatively associated with others (e.g., uncontrollable worry). These findings suggest that different forms of social support may have distinct effects on specific anxiety symptoms.
conclusionsNetwork analysis revealed that family support consistently served as a key protective factor against anxiety symptoms, while the influence of friend and other support weakened over time. These findings highlight the dynamic nature of support systems and provide implications for tailored mental health interventions in college students during and after the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.