ArticleBMC public health2025
Decoding the adolescent non-suicidal self-injury: understanding with interpretable machine learning insights.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable prediction of one-year non-suicidal self-injury among patients with mood disorders: model development and internal evaluation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Interpretability of automated machine learning methods in psychological research: A tutorial with AutoGluon in Python.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Parental harsh parenting and non-suicidal self-injury among Chinese adolescents: the role of emotional uncontrollability, deviant peer affiliation, school disengagement, and self-control.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNon-suicidal self-injury is a common risk behavior in adolescence but is often difficult to detect. This study employs interpretable machine learning techniques to develop a classification model for adolescent non-suicidal self-injury and elucidate pertinent factors. Employing diverse algorithms, a comprehensive analysis is conducted to discern critical risk and protective elements within a large dataset, evaluating their alignment with the Integrated Theoretical Model.
methodsIn partnership with educational institutions in eastern China, this research compiled data on behaviors and correlated factors through the administration of questionnaires, incorporating demographic information and seven validated scales. Analytical models were built using six machine learning techniques: K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, CatBoost, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting.
resultsThe analysis included a total of 2989 valid responses samples. Among the algorithms, CatBoost demonstrated superior performance, evidenced by an AUPRC of 0.736 and an AUC of 0.863. SHAP visualization highlighted 23 important items. Exploratory factor analysis identified seven factors, designated as Situational Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms, Positive Daily Functioning, Negative Self Esteem, Self-Appraisal of Behavior, Bullying and Reactive Aggression, and Interpersonal Problems and Self-Acceptance.
conclusionLeveraging multiple machine learning algorithms for a holistic item analysis, this research identifies critical risk and protective factors for non-suicidal self-injury, thus refining the Integrated Theoretical Model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.