ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Challenges faced by the Iranian health system in response process to terrorist explosive attacks: a descriptive phenomenology qualitative study of live experiences.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMass casualty incidents present significant challenges not only for healthcare providers and emergency service responders at the incident scene, but also for the hospitals that receive those affected. Terrorism related mass casualty incidents can lead to a diverse array of circumstances, necessitating those hospitals and their personnel be adequately prepared to manage more complex and demanding requirements. This study aimed to explore the health system challenges related to the response process to terrorist explosive bombing attacks from the perspective of Iranian health system managers and experts.
methodsThe present qualitative study employs a descriptive phenomenology approach conducted in Iran. Data were gathered through in-depth individual interviews with 16 health managers and experts, using purposive sampling. The Data analysis was conducted utilizing Colaizzi's 7-step method. To ensure the trustworthiness of the findings, the study adhered to the recommendations set forth by Lincoln and Guba.
resultsAfter multiple rounds of analyzing and summarizing the data and taking into consideration similarities and differences, 230 initial codes, 18 sub-categories, 5 categories and 2 main themes were created based on the results of data analysis. Theme 1: Intra-organizational challenges including categories of (prehospital and hospital challenges). Theme 2: Inter-organizational challenges including categories of (chain of command, insufficient security and ineffective communication and information).
conclusionThis study explored healthcare workers and managers experiences with internal and external organizational challenges in responding to terrorist explosive bombing attacks. Findings reveal that such incidents pose unique demands distinct from other emergencies, requiring tailored preparedness strategies, especially in prehospital, hospital, and logistical sectors, despite existing general disaster plans. An effective response needs multisectoral collaboration with security forces and aid organizations. The presentation of real-world insights can inform targeted preparedness programs for high-risk, chaotic terrorist scenarios. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.