ArticleBMC public health2025
Are mortality rates similar between jobs in the Queensland coal mine workers' cohort?
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does your job really matter? Job-specific cancer incidence among a cohort coal mine workers in Queensland, Australia.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoal mine workers are exposed to many occupational hazards which may affect mortality including respirable coal mine dust, crystalline silica and diesel engine emissions. Several studies have shown decreased overall mortality, but studies did not define the jobs held, did not include women coal mine workers and lacked smoking data.
methodsA cohort of coal mine workers, from Queensland, Australia, was linked to the national death registry. Those who had had a health assessment after 1993 were grouped by job title into eight Work Categories. Mortality by Work Categories were compared to the Australian population to produce standardised mortality ratios (SMRs). Relative mortality ratios (RMR) by sex were calculated comparing risks within the cohort, adjusted for age, era (calendar period) and smoking.
resultsThere were 4,555 deaths among 161,534 men and 196 among 23,967 women with job titles. The median age at inception was 33 (men) and 30 (women) years. SMRs were significantly reduced for men and women. However, compared with other men in the cohort, increased mortality was found from digestive diseases (Maintenance workers and Truck Drivers), respiratory diseases (Construction and Labourers) and accidents (Production, Labourers and Truck Drivers). Circulatory disease mortality was increased for male Production workers adjusted RMR (aRMR) 1.22(95%CI 1.06-1.40), Unexposed Non-Office aRMR 1.64(95%CI 1.15-2.35) and Labourers aRMR 1.48 95%CI (1.00-2.17) and Truck Drivers aRMR 1.21(95%CI 0.95-1.54), while accidental deaths were higher in female cleaners aRMR 3.13(95%CI 1.30-7.57). The suicide rate was higher for men and women in Production jobs.
conclusionsAlthough a relatively young cohort, mortality risk varied by type of work. Risk of death from circulatory causes was increased in some workers, even after adjusting for smoking. Suicide rates are higher for men and women doing Production jobs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.