Observational studyBMC nephrology2025
Cardiopulmonary recirculation in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: the "Monday Morning Phenomenon".
Observational study in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06394986 (Cardio-fistular Recirculation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cardio-fistular Recirculation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiopulmonary recirculation (CPR) is a known risk factor for heart failure (HF). Typically, the assessment is performed on the interdialytic day. Hemodialysis (HD) sessions can induce significant hemodynamic changes, which may be important for patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (EF), in whom the risk may be underestimated.
objectiveTo evaluate the dynamics of CPR due to a HD session following a long interdialytic gap in patients with HF and preserved EF.
methodsThe prospective cohort single-arm study included 20 adult HD patients who met the inclusion criteria: EF ≥ 50%, NYHA I-II, AVF volume blood flow (Qa) ≥ 1 L/min, CPR < 30%, interdialytic weight gain < 5%, and eKt/V > 1.2. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography on the third day after the previous HD session (Monday/Tuesday), 1 h prior to and 2 h after the session. In addition, the Qa of the brachial artery was measured. ClinicalTrials Id: NCT06394986 (May 01, 2024).
resultsA reduction in cardiac preload after HD was evidenced by a decrease in the volume of cardiac chambers, as well as a reduction in pulmonary artery systolic pressure and arterial blood pressure. The EF and Qa slightly decreased (2.46% [95% CI 1.47; 3.45], p < 0.001 and 0.12 L/min [95% CI 0.09; 0.14], p < 0.001, respectively), whereas cardiac output decreased significantly (1.71 L/min [95% CI 0.8; 2.6], p < 0.001). This led to an increase in CPR of 5.1% [95% CI 3.9; 6.4], p < 0.001. As a result, in 5 patients, the CPR exceeded 30% after HD. In the sensitivity analysis, no parameters significantly associated with the variance CPR were identified.
conclusionsSome patients experience a significant increase in CPR after HD. However, the prognostic value of this phenomenon remains unclear. For patients with HF and normal or subnormal CPR measured on the interdialytic day, it is advisable to determine the CPR shortly after HD. This may serve as a ‘stress test’ to identify hidden hemodynamic disorders and manifest the cardiotoxic effect of AVF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.