Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40890529›Full record

ArticleArchives of women's mental health2025

Reconstructing self-position in women with severe burn injury: a qualitative study.

Behnam Barzgar, Mohammad Reza Jani, Hassan Eslamialiabadi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Behnam BarzgarBirjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Mohammad Reza JaniBirjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Hassan EslamialiabadiBirjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Islamic Republic of Iran. h.eslami1300@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the challenges women may face after experiencing severe burns is a shift in their social and marital roles. The process by which they reclaim these roles remains unclear. PURPOSE: This study was carried out to explore how women work to restore their marital and social status.

methodsThis qualitative research involved face-to-face, semi-structured interviews using open-ended questions. Sixteen women with severe burn injuries participated in the study. Data collection proceeded until no new information emerged (data saturation), and the analysis was carried out using a conventional content analysis approach. The study was conducted in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR).

resultsTwo themes and six subthemes emerged: Consistency of self-position in married life (self-sacrifice, continuity of roles, normalization of sexual relations) and social interaction (social isolation, reliance on internal forces in interaction with the community, use of available support).

conclusionFollowing severe burn injuries, women often strive to reestablish their roles within their marital and social relationships. Healthcare professionals, including nurses and physicians, can play a vital role by educating survivors and their families (particularly their spouses) about how to effectively cope with the challenges associated with severe burns. Such educational efforts can support women in reclaiming their position and improving their overall well-being.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalBurnsMarriageSelf ConceptSurvivorsAdultFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial IsolationSocial SupportSpousesMarital lifePosition rebuildingSevere burnSocial interactionsWomen's burns

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.