ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[Environmental justice-challenges for spatial analysis and monitoring].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatiotemporal analysis and monitoring of socially unequally distributed environmental hazards and resources as well as their effects on health provide an important basis for political decisions under environmental justice aspects. Appropriate analysis and monitoring approaches are accompanied by diverse conceptual and methodological challenges, which are described and discussed in this paper.A major challenge lies in the comprehensive modeling of environmental exposures, as measurement data are often only selectively available, requiring complex interpolation methods. Further challenges lie in quantifying inequalities in environmental exposures, as environmental and social data are usually only available in aggregate form at the level of administrative spatial units, and in the lack of data on subjective assessment of the quality of environmental exposures. Specific challenges to large-scale, Europe-wide monitoring of health-relevant environmental inequalities by the World Health Organization (WHO) arise from a lack of information on relevant environmental exposures or inequality dimensions, different types of data, and a lack of quantification of social differences in vulnerability. This currently limits the ability to make statements about the social distribution of environmental exposures in the European Region and their health effects.In order to make informed political decisions and reduce socially unequally distributed environmental burdens and resources as well as their health effects in an evidence-based manner, a substantial improvement regarding data availability is necessary as a prerequisite for a comprehensive, standardized monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.