ArticleScientific reports2025
A repetitive amplitude encoding method for enhancing the mapping ability of quantum neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantum-inspired squeeze-and-excitation in a time-conditioned U-Net for satellite image cloud removal.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of quantum machine learning, quantum neural networks (QNNs) have become a research hotspot. However, the quantum gates used to implement feature mapping in this model are all linear transformations, which directly affects the mapping ability of the model. Therefore, how to enhance the mapping capability of QNN is an important issue that has not yet been effectively addressed. This paper proposes a repetitive amplitude encoding method that encodes the probability amplitudes of multiple qubit blocks by repeatedly using the same set of classical data, effectively improving the mapping capability of QNN. Taking the MNIST dataset as an example, the experimental results comparing the repetitive amplitude encoding method with several existing encoding methods show that, firstly, when the number of classes is fixed, the repetitive amplitude encoding is superior to other methods. Secondly, when the number of hidden layers in QNN is fixed, as the number of classes increases, the performance of repetitive amplitude encoding not only consistently outperforms other methods, but this advantage becomes increasingly apparent. Finally, the repetitive amplitude encoding-based QNN was applied to reservoir lithology identification in the field of oil and gas exploration, IRIS and WINe classification datasets. By comparing with classical neural networks, the proposed method was validated for its adaptability to different classification problems and superior classification performance compared to classical neural networks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.