ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated drug design for druggable target identification using integrated stacked autoencoder and hierarchically self-adaptive optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LiBRe: A Ligand-Aware Sequence-Based Binding Residue Prediction Model for Virtual Screening.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven drug discovery: a deep learning paradigm shift in pharmaceutical research and development.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug classification and target identification are crucial yet challenging steps in drug discovery. Existing methods often suffer from inefficiencies, overfitting, and limited scalability. Traditional approaches like support vector machines and XGBoost struggle to handle large, complex pharmaceutical datasets effectively. Deep learning models, while powerful, face challenges with interpretability, computational complexity, and generalization to unseen data. This study addresses these limitations by introducing a novel framework: optSAE + HSAPSO. This framework integrates a stacked autoencoder (SAE) for robust feature extraction with a hierarchically self-adaptive particle swarm optimization (HSAPSO) algorithm for adaptive parameter optimization. This combination delivers superior performance across various classification metrics. Experimental evaluations on datasets from DrugBank and Swiss-Prot demonstrate that optSAE + HSAPSO achieves a high accuracy of 95.52%. Notably, it exhibits significantly reduced computational complexity (0.010 s per sample) and exceptional stability (± 0.003). Compared to state-of-the-art methods, the framework offers higher accuracy, faster convergence, and greater resilience to variability. Furthermore, ROC and convergence analyses confirm its robustness and generalization capability, maintaining consistent performance across both validation and unseen datasets. By leveraging advanced optimization techniques, the framework efficiently handles large feature sets and diverse pharmaceutical data, making it a scalable and adaptable solution for real-world drug discovery applications. However, the method's performance is dependent on the quality of the training data, and fine-tuning may be necessary for high-dimensional datasets. Despite these limitations, the optSAE + HSAPSO framework demonstrates transformative potential, significantly reducing computational overhead while improving classification accuracy and reliability. This work advances the field of pharmaceutical informatics by presenting a reliable and efficient framework for drug classification and target identification. These findings open promising avenues for future research, including extending the framework to other domains such as disease diagnostics or genetic data classification, ultimately accelerating the drug development process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.