ArticleScientific reports2025
Temporal transcriptomic dynamics in rat spinal cord after tibial fracture unveil crosstalk between spinal cord and bone.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injury induces progressive bone loss and increases fracture susceptibility. While the neurological consequences of skeletal trauma remain poorly characterized, underlying molecular mechanisms require systematic investigation. To systematically characterize the temporal dynamics of spinal cord responses, L4-L5 spinal segments were harvested from Sprague-Dawley rats at 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days post-fracture for RNA sequencing (Illumina platform). Integrated bioinformatics analyses revealed temporally stratified differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to validate the expression of key genes. Transcriptomic changes peaked at 3 days and 7 days post-fracture. By day 14, transcriptomic signatures shifted toward synaptic plasticity-related pathways. DEGs were substantially reduced by day 28. Key genes (PCP4 and RICTOR) identified by bioinformatics were validated via qRT-PCR, confirming their temporal expression patterns. This study elucidates temporal dynamics of spinal cord transcriptomic remodeling post-fracture, establishing a foundation for understanding neuro-osseous cross-talk during bone healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.