ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive analysis of MAGE-A10 in pan-cancer and its validation in gastric cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Double-Edged Sword of Genomic DNA Methylation: Orchestrating Gastric Carcinogenesis and Shaping Precision Oncology.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies found that melanoma antigen genes (MAGE) were antigens expressed in various tumor cells but hardly expressed in normal tissues, and their unique expression pattern made them highly promising for cancer immunotherapy. MAGE-A10 was a member of the MAGE family, and although it was expressed in various tumors, its specific function remained unclear. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive pan-cancer analysis of MAGE-A10 expression, prognostic value, DNA methylation, genetic variation, function, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity using multiple public databases. The results showed that MAGE-A10 was highly expressed in tumor tissues of most cancer types and was associated with poor prognosis. Additionally, MAGE-A10 was closely related to methylation levels, genetic variation, immune cell infiltration, immune therapy response, and chemotherapy resistance, possibly due to its role in regulating gene expression, cell differentiation, and immune response. Validation experiments in gastric cancer found that high expression of MAGE-A10 significantly affected patient prognosis. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated that high expression of MAGE-A10 was closely associated with the binding of histone deacetylases. Cell experiments showed that knocking down MAGE-A10 significantly reduced the proliferation, migration, and invasion capabilities of gastric cancer cells, which might be related to its regulation of the expression of cell adhesion molecule cadherins. In conclusion, this study indicated that MAGE-A10 was a potential tumor prognostic biomarker and immunotherapy target and played an important role in the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.