Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40890423›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning based approach for surface roughness prediction in precision dental prototyping.

Anmol Sharma, Ravinder S Saini, Ashish Kaushik, Abdulmajeed Okshah, Mohamed Saheer Kuruniyan, Vishwanath Gurumurthy, Rajesh Vyas, Rayan Ibrahim H Binduhayyim, Artak Heboyan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anmol Sharma *USICT, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Sector 16C, Dwarka, Delhi, India.
Ravinder S Saini *Department of Allied Dental Health Sciences COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ashish KaushikMechanical Engineering Department, Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University, Chandu-Budhera Road, Gurugram, India.
Abdulmajeed OkshahDepartment of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed Saheer KuruniyanDepartment of Allied Dental Health Sciences COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Vishwanath GurumurthyDepartment of Allied Dental Health Sciences COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Rajesh VyasDepartment of Dental Technology, COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Rayan Ibrahim H BinduhayyimDepartment of Allied Dental Health Sciences COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Artak HeboyanDepartment of Research Analytics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India. a_heboyan@farabi.tums.ac.ir.

Funding

King Khalid University RGP2/475/45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex geometries achievable with resin-based 3D printing are susceptible to lower levels of surface roughness, particularly in areas where support structures are attached and removed. The slicing parameter serves as the cornerstone for developing a model for predicting the corresponding output. In the present research, a resin 3D printer is used to fabricate the specimens in accordance with the combination of important parameters that were recovered utilizing the design of the experiment (DoE). Layer thickness, infill population density, print angle, exposure time, and lift speed are the five factors used to build DoE, which consists of 32 ideal runs for assessing surface roughness (SR). SR is a critical factor that influences the durability and effectiveness of dental devices. In order to anticipate output, a model is developed. To choose the best modelling strategies, a comparison of three base model techniques, artificial neural networks (ANN), support-vector regression (SVR), and decision trees (DT), as well as two ensemble techniques, random forest (RF) and XGboost, is conducted. This work utilized hyperparameter tuning for model improvement and use RMSE and R

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrinting, Three-DimensionalComputer-Aided DesignHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineSurface PropertiesAdditive manufacturingHyperparameter tuningProcess modellingResin

Identifiers

PMID40890423
PMCPMC12402308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.