ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning based approach for surface roughness prediction in precision dental prototyping.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- HMQ-ES-Stack-GBR: A Hybrid Ensemble Learning Model for Mechanical and Physical Quality Prediction in FDM 3D Printing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for Optimal Prediction of Printed-Line Features in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Design and Optimization of Orthodontic Materials: A Clinical Perspective on Current State and Future Directions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Complex geometries achievable with resin-based 3D printing are susceptible to lower levels of surface roughness, particularly in areas where support structures are attached and removed. The slicing parameter serves as the cornerstone for developing a model for predicting the corresponding output. In the present research, a resin 3D printer is used to fabricate the specimens in accordance with the combination of important parameters that were recovered utilizing the design of the experiment (DoE). Layer thickness, infill population density, print angle, exposure time, and lift speed are the five factors used to build DoE, which consists of 32 ideal runs for assessing surface roughness (SR). SR is a critical factor that influences the durability and effectiveness of dental devices. In order to anticipate output, a model is developed. To choose the best modelling strategies, a comparison of three base model techniques, artificial neural networks (ANN), support-vector regression (SVR), and decision trees (DT), as well as two ensemble techniques, random forest (RF) and XGboost, is conducted. This work utilized hyperparameter tuning for model improvement and use RMSE and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.