ArticleScientific reports2025
A deception detection model by using integrated LLM with emotion features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional lie detection relies on the experience of human interrogators, making it susceptible to subjective factors and leading to misjudgments. To solve this problem, we propose an emotion-enhanced deception detection model, Lie Detection using XGBoost with RoBERTa-based Emotion Features (LieXBerta). In this framework, the Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach (RoBERTa) is used to extract emotional features from interrogation texts. The emotional features are then combined with facial and action features and subsequently fed into an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier for deception detection. This approach aims to improve the objectivity and accuracy of deception detection in courtroom settings. For verifying the proposed algorithm, we develop a trial text dataset enriched with detailed emotional features. Simulation experiments demonstrate that the LieXBerta model incorporating emotional features outperforms baseline models that use only traditional features and several classical machine learning models. The experimental results show that after parameter tuning, the accuracy of the LieXBerta model increased to 87.50%, respectively, marking a 6.5% improvement over the baseline model. Moreover, the runtime of the tuned LieXBerta model with reduced features was reduced by 42%, significantly enhancing the training efficiency and prediction performance for deception detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.