ArticleScientific reports2025
BamClassifier: a machine learning method for assessing iron deficiency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond prediction: explainable machine learning for ferritin estimation from complete blood count.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Chlamy_ChloroPred: a deep learning-based, highly accurate binary classifier for chloroplast protein prediction in the model microalga,Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron deficiency (ID) is a well-known cause of anaemia and could lead to adverse clinical and functional impairments. However, ID is under-diagnosed due to non-specific symptoms, difficulties in interpreting ambiguous assessment outcomes and suboptimal sensitivities of methods in some circumstances. In this study, we present BamClassifier, a machine learning method for assessment of ID. This method proceeds by repeated selection of samples of instances from routine complete blood count data in such a way that each observation is included in exactly one sample. Then, a median-supplement machine learning model built from each sample, and the performance of the model on test instances are aggregated into a bag of predictions from which ID statuses are assigned to samples by way of the highest frequency counts. We show the effectiveness of our method by applying to real datasets obtained from different investigations in Ghana and simulated data as well. Our method obtained perfect area under receiver operating characteristic curve in all experiments and significantly outperformed other well-established methods in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and diagnostic odds ratio in all our evaluations. A successful application of the method will permit the study of large collections of samples for ID assessments, save time and cost using complete blood count parameters, while standardizing interpretation of outcomes of such investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.