ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated rating of Fazekas scale in fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI for ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinal hemodynamic and caliber biomarkers for the assessment of cerebral small vessel disease burden: insights from fundus fluorescein angiography.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Are AI Neuroimaging Models Ready for Clinical Use? A Systematic Methodological Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comparable efficacy and safety of bridging therapy versus direct mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are commonly assessed using the Fazekas scale, a subjective visual grading system. Despite the emergence of deep learning models for automatic WMH grading, their application in stroke patients remains limited. This study aimed to develop and validate an automatic segmentation and grading model for WMH in stroke patients, utilizing spatial-probabilistic methods. We developed a two-step deep learning pipeline to predict Fazekas scale scores from T2-weighted FLAIR images. First, WMH segmentation was performed using a residual neural network based on the U-Net architecture. Then, Fazekas scale grading was carried out using a 3D convolutional neural network trained on the segmented WMH probability volumes. A total of 471 stroke patients from three different sources were included in the analysis. The performance metrics included area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), Dice similarity coefficient, and absolute error for WMH volume prediction. In addition, agreement analysis and quadratic weighted kappa were calculated to assess the accuracy of the Fazekas scale predictions. The WMH segmentation model achieved an AUPRC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.55-0.95) and a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.49-0.87) in the internal test set. The mean absolute error between the true and predicted WMH volumes was 3.1 ml (95% CI, 0.0 ml-15.9 ml), with no significant variation across Fazekas scale categories. The agreement analysis demonstrated strong concordance, with an R-squared value of 0.91, a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.96, and a systematic difference of 0.33 ml in the internal test set, and 0.94, 0.97, and 0.40 ml, respectively, in the external validation set. In predicting Fazekas scores, the 3D convolutional neural network achieved quadratic weighted kappa values of 0.951 for regression tasks and 0.956 for classification tasks in the internal test set, and 0.898 and 0.956, respectively, in the external validation set. The proposed deep learning pipeline demonstrated robust performance in automatic WMH segmentation and Fazekas scale grading from FLAIR images in stroke patients. This approach offers a reliable and efficient tool for evaluating WMH burden, which may assist in predicting future vascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.