ArticleScientific reports2025
Computed tomography derived FFR and plaque features in prognosis of aortic stenosis combined with coronary artery disease after TAVR.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of preoperative CT-derived fractional flow reserve after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Observational
- How to Individualize Coronary Assessment and Revascularization in Severe AS Patients Undergoing TAVI in the Era of Lifetime Management?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To assess the value of computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and high-risk plaque characteristics (HRPC) in the prediction of prognosis in patients with concomitant aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The study was a post hoc analysis from a multicenter TAVR registry. Patients with AS and obstructive CAD who underwent successful TAVR treatment were enrolled. The CT-FFR and HRPC were measured in coronary vessels with ≥ 50% stenosis lesions. The patients were then grouped according to CT-FFR (≤ 0.8 vs. >0.8) and HRPC (Yes vs. No) criteria. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization. The multivariable Cox proportional regression was used to identify independent predictors of MACE. To assess the combined prognostic value of CT-FFR and HRPC to OPT-CAD risk, receiver operating characteristic curves were used and the area under the curve (AUC) was determined. A total of 213 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 74.34 years and 125 (58.4%) were male. The patients with lower CT-FFR (≤ 0.8) had a higher rate of MACE compared with those with CT-FFR > 0.8 (11.9% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.011). However, there was no significant difference in MACE incidence (9.0% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.38) between patients with and without HRPC, respectively. The Cox regression model revealed that advanced age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.003-1.15, P = 0.04), elevated NT-proBNP levels (HR 1.004, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, P = 0.046), and higher CT-FFR (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.97, P = 0.03) were independent predictors of MACE. The optimal threshold value for predicting MACE using CT-FFR was determined to be 0.79. The performance in predicting MACE using the OPT-CAD score model was enhanced when both CT-FFR and HRPC were incorporated into the model [AUC 0.63 (0.49-0.76) vs. 0.74 (0.63-0.84), P = 0.04]. Pre-procedure CT-FFR was an independent predictor of MACE in patients with concomitant AS and CAD after TAVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.