ArticleScientific reports2025
Heterogeneity-optimized method for predicting immune checkpoint blockade response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical imaging in immunotherapy response evaluation: from RECIST to AI-driven longitudinal models, and the distinction between risk prediction and kinetic diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Morphological and Optical Characterization of NRAS-Mutant Melanoma Cells and Primary Melanocytes via Quantitative Phase Imaging With Digital Holographic Microscopy.Cell biochemistry and function · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interpatient tumor heterogeneity manifests as multimodal distributions across genomic, transcriptomic, and microenvironmental profiles. This fundamentally violates the unimodal assumption of conventional machine learning models, impairing immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) response prediction. To resolve this limitation, we propose a heterogeneity-optimized framework that applies K-means clustering to stratify patients into biologically distinct hot-tumor and cold-tumor subgroups, demonstrating superiority over hierarchical/DBSCAN clustering. Subsequently, heterogeneity-optimized predictive models-a support vector machine for hot-tumor subtypes and a random forest for cold-tumor subtypes-were developed utilizing seven heterogeneity-associated biomarkers to circumvent unimodal constraints. The proposed model significantly enhances ICB response prediction in melanoma, NSCLC, other cancer types, and pan-cancer datasets, achieving a mean accuracy gain of at least 1.24% compared to 11 baseline methods. This performance improvement was consistently validated in an independent external cohort. Furthermore, the approach enables biologically interpretable precision immunotherapy by explicitly modeling multimodal heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.