Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40890336›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Heterogeneity-optimized method for predicting immune checkpoint blockade response.

Juan Liang, Qihang Guo, Shan Xiang, Yun Wang, Juntao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan LiangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Henan Institute of Technology, Xinxiang, 453003, China.
Qihang GuoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, China.
Shan XiangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, China.
Yun WangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, China. yunwang8@163.com.
Juntao LiSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, China. juntaolimail@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpatient tumor heterogeneity manifests as multimodal distributions across genomic, transcriptomic, and microenvironmental profiles. This fundamentally violates the unimodal assumption of conventional machine learning models, impairing immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) response prediction. To resolve this limitation, we propose a heterogeneity-optimized framework that applies K-means clustering to stratify patients into biologically distinct hot-tumor and cold-tumor subgroups, demonstrating superiority over hierarchical/DBSCAN clustering. Subsequently, heterogeneity-optimized predictive models-a support vector machine for hot-tumor subtypes and a random forest for cold-tumor subtypes-were developed utilizing seven heterogeneity-associated biomarkers to circumvent unimodal constraints. The proposed model significantly enhances ICB response prediction in melanoma, NSCLC, other cancer types, and pan-cancer datasets, achieving a mean accuracy gain of at least 1.24% compared to 11 baseline methods. This performance improvement was consistently validated in an independent external cohort. Furthermore, the approach enables biologically interpretable precision immunotherapy by explicitly modeling multimodal heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunotherapyMelanomaSupport Vector MachineBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsHeterogeneityImmune checkpoint blockadeMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40890336
PMCPMC12402297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.